<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spatial dependence in mineral exploration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bulk-online.com/sampling-statistics/spatial-dependence-in-mineral-exploration.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bulk-online.com/sampling-statistics/spatial-dependence-in-mineral-exploration.html</link>
	<description>A weblog for the worldwide powder and bulk solids handling and processing community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:26:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crusher</title>
		<link>http://blog.bulk-online.com/sampling-statistics/spatial-dependence-in-mineral-exploration.html/comment-page-1#comment-31525</link>
		<dc:creator>crusher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bulk-online.com/?p=574#comment-31525</guid>
		<description>After showing my audience how to derive 95% confidence limits of the masses of in-situ gold and silver, I asked why the variance of Agterbergâ€™s distance-weighted average point grade is still missing. I didnâ€™t get a single response. There were no questions and I got but a pinch of polite applause. My soul mate got an anonymous note together with the second coming of Clarkâ€™s 1979 Practical Geostatistics on DVD. Which APCOM 2009 sponsor ignored my question but handed my spouse an anonymous note? Was it Gemcom? Or did Geovariances do it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After showing my audience how to derive 95% confidence limits of the masses of in-situ gold and silver, I asked why the variance of Agterbergâ€™s distance-weighted average point grade is still missing. I didnâ€™t get a single response. There were no questions and I got but a pinch of polite applause. My soul mate got an anonymous note together with the second coming of Clarkâ€™s 1979 Practical Geostatistics on DVD. Which APCOM 2009 sponsor ignored my question but handed my spouse an anonymous note? Was it Gemcom? Or did Geovariances do it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

